This is a thought-provoking letter written by Kurt Vonnegut opposing the idea of burning books of young children, in view of transforming the system of education in America.
Explanation:
In this letter, Vonnegut starts telling audience/readers the ideas that can have a negative effect, not only on the target person/individual, but also on a wider range because of its effect being new and historic.
Though in view of a change, Vonnegut argues that this act of burning books is not what we all should accept. In Paragraphs 7 and 8, when Vonnegut explains about how people feel it is their right to decide what their children must read, the author explains to them that it is true but doing that in an un-American way - harsh, impractical, ignorant manner can cause a negative impact for them.
In the next point of argument, author talks about how people/nations who didn't read books, didn't let ideas emerge among people fought wars. They created destruction all over world. The author clearly states that people/nations who read books have been a part of development, improvement and liberation.
A and E both support the point.
Here are some tips for your letter if your having trouble, like what type of job you wanna work at or if your gonna get married and have kids etc.
Answer:
Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first.
Explanation:
The options you were given are the following:
- Kohlberg came up with a theory to describe the different ways that human beings make moral choices.
- They tend to follow the rules that their parents and teachers make because they are thinking about getting something good or not getting in trouble.
- They see rules as being the same for everyone, and they think it is important and valuable to do what one is ‘supposed’ to do.
- Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first.
The given question refers to a text about the stages of moral development defined by American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg. According to him, there are six stages of moral development, and the more we grow and progress as individuals, the higher the stage we're on is.
The quote that best supports the idea that the common good becomes more important to people as we age is the fourth one: <em>Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first. </em>
Stage 2 is usually present in children when they still aren't familiar with the concept of the common good. A child can't be at Stage 5, and an adult who has reached it will never go back to Stage 2. A person who cares about their community and other people will not regress.
This is why the fourth option is the correct one.
i think it C maybe but let me know if I'm wrong
