<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.
<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.
<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.
So the answer is:
b. checking its conclusions against other sources
The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.
What injustices are you trying to find out exactly?
Answer:
tell the time, measure the heights of stars and buildings, and for many other calculations and observations.Explanation: the internet said so
Democracy requires people to participate, it encourages people to participate. Even if a representative democracy may feel distant, the reality is that voters are more likely to see their petitions and interests protected than non voter. Yet, many people don’t vote. Understanding the reasons why people don’t vote, or why they chose a certain candidate over another, reveals issues in our society that may not be obvious. Politics is not always rational or easy to interpret in terms of interests, sometimes because people are not fully aware of their interest and how the candidates can protect them or harm them. Emotion drives voting as much as reason if not more. Politologist and campaign experts study this behaviors and use it in diverse ways.
B. A strong sense of attachment or belonging to one's country.
Here's a tip, do you see the word nation in nationalism?
Nationalism also led to world war 1 when a serbian murdered archduke franz ferdinand
