Behind every great man is a great woman
did you mean that ???
answer:
True
explanation:
A good plot must be logical in order for the audience to make sense of it you cant just put a random character in or plot twist without developing it at least little.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the text. Without the text, we do not have a specific reference to answer your question.
However, trying to be of help, we can comment on the following general terms.
We can describe the character of Charles Wallace as the little brother of the Murray family in the film "A Wrinkle in Time." He is 5 years old, just a child, but he is super smart. He is very intelligent. He is like the new generation of children with telepathic skills and different abilities than adults.
He uses an elevated form of language because his very proper and educated, not reflecting the vocabulary of common children his age.
"A Wrinkle of Time" is a film produced by Disney Studios in 2018. It is based on an American novel with the same title, written in 1962 by Madeleine Le' Engle Camp.
The samson get closer to the bag as Samson have stimulated severa cultural references, serving as a image of brute energy, heroism, self-destruction, and romantic betrayal.
<h3>What is the story of the samson ?</h3>
The biblical account states that Samson changed into a Nazirite, and that he changed into given monstrous energy to resource him towards his enemies and permit him to carry out superhuman feats, such as slaying a lion together along with his palms and massacring a whole navy of Philistines the use of most effective the jawbone of a donkey.
Samson changed into a mythical Israelite warrior and judge, a member of the tribe of Dan, and a Nazirite. His monstrous bodily energy, which he used for two decades towards the Philistines, derived from his uncut hair.
Read more about the stories:
brainly.com/question/24220044
#SPJ1
Answer:
The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
Explanation:
