35 POINTS! Do you think Brown v. Board of Education (1954) served its purpose of societal desegregation well? Or, do you think t
hat that lack of legal justification in the decision created a more litigious environment for civil rights law suits? Think about and justify your position. THIS ISN"T AN ESSAY JUST A FEW SENTENCES.
It did in the long run. In the short run it created many issues because there was a rise in extremism, in southern states especially. For starters, racists didn't want to desegregate their schools and public places so they didn't enforce the decision of the court throughout the entire next decade. Another thing is that organizations that were illegal like the Ku Klux Klan started getting power and harassing innocent African-Americans. It did create a litigious environment however because suddenly there were many more cases regarding desegregation and they had the court's precedence support so they were easily won because of the way the legal system works. It didn't lack legal justification, the only problem was enforcing it before the civil rights acts were passed and the country started battling racism systematically in all of the United States.
After the Indian Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, the British government assumed full control, dissolving the trading company. Imperial rule destroyed India's local hand loom industry to fund its own industrialization.
Assuming this is talking about Confucianism, there are 5 fundamental relationships. Father>Son, Husband>Wife, Elderly>Youth, Older sibling>younger sibling, Ruler>peasent
The correct answer is "One Branch Congress", but later on we have concluded that the One Branch Congress gave too much power to the government and less than the people, hope this answer has helped you.
