ANSWER: BOT
EXPLANATION: When a PC is experiencing the listed effects, it thus depicts that the PC is under attack by a bot, which is a type of script or software application that establishes automated tasks via command.
However, a bad bots often initiate malicious tasks that gives room for attackers to take control over an affected PC remotely, most especially for fraudulent activities.
When several affected computers are connected, they form a botnet connection.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
#here is code in python.
# read the food bill
tot_bill=float(input("Please enter the food bill:"))
# tax on food
tax=0.06
#choice for tip by user
choice=int(input("enter your choice for tip:(1 for 15%, 2 for 18% and 3 for 20% :)"))
// calculate the total food bill
if choice==1:
tot_food_bill=tot_bill+tot_bill*tax+tot_bill*(.15)
elif choice==2:
tot_food_bill=tot_bill+tot_bill*tax+tot_bill*(.18)
elif choice==3:
tot_food_bill=tot_bill+tot_bill*tax+tot_bill*(.2)
else:
print("invalid choice:")
#print the total food bill
print("total food bill is ",tot_food_bill)
Explanation:
Read the food bill from user and assign it to variable "tot_bill".Initialize the tax=0.06 (i.e. 6%) on the bill.Then ask user to give his choice for tip. if the choice is 1 then tip will be 15%, if 2 then 18% and if choice is 3 Then tip will be 20% of the bill.Calculate the total food bill and assign it to variable "tot_food_bill".
Output:
Please enter the food bill:100
enter your choice for tip:(1 for 15%, 2 for 18% and 3 for 20% :)2
total food bill is 124.0
