The first author, Julia, describes the facts as anecdotes of her family, while the other author, Mark, reports the events from an unknown source. Both authors write about the culling of Haitians in lands they are clearly not welcome in. Moreover, while Julia states the reason behind the killing of Haitians - having learned from her family its due to the hate the ruler of the land holds againts them -, Mark describes in detail the victim identification methods of these people - being the verification of their pronunciation.
<span>All points of view happen inside the narrator of the
story’s minds. A point of view is the narrator of the whole story. There are
three types of point of views: first, second and third point of view. In this
question, it could be the first person point of view, is when one of the characters
is the narrator and usually describes things using ‘I’ or third person point of
view is someone not included in the story and can be objective third person –
narrator only shares the facts and no emotions; limited third person – includes
feeling and emotions and omniscient third person – narrator partly reveals both
the emotions and facts.</span>
Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the A. Spanish royal council meeting notes concerning strategies for defeating Muslims.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that, on the one hand, it is said that "European leaders concluded that [...]," and, on the other hand, it is said that "Visionary Europeans hoped to weaken their enemy [...]" Although Sub-Saharan African ivory carvings depicting Muslim merchant caravans and a blueprint of a fast sailing vessel would support the first and second part of the argument, respectively, I believe that the first primary source would most likely support the totality of the argument, since it reflects the opinion of important European leaders—members of the Spanish royal council—concerning strategies for defeating the Muslims, and surely their increasing power, therefore supporting both parts or sections of the argument. Option B does not apply here, since the excerpt is talking about trade in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
Answer:
yeah same i shoulda been a dog bruh :
Answer:
"like dust, I'll rise"
Explanation:
simile is a comparison between things using the word like and as.
e.g. The pillow is as smooth as a teddy bear.
Her cheeks are red like a rose.
