Okay I'll give you the excerpts I think you refer to (lines in brackets are options):
<span><span>1. Oh! my dear Mr. Bennet," as she entered the room, "we have had a most delightful evening, a most excellent ball. I wish you had been there. Jane was so admired, nothing could be like it. Everybody said how well she looked; and Mr. Bingley thought her quite beautiful, and danced with her twice! Only think of that, my dear; <span>(he actually danced with her twice! and she was the only creature in the room that he asked a second time. First of all, he asked Miss Lucas. I was so vexed to see him stand up with her!</span>)
</span><span>2. "His pride," said Miss Lucas, "does not offend me so much as pride often does, because there is an excuse for it. <span>(One cannot wonder that so very fine a young man, with family, fortune, everything in his favour, should think highly of himself. If I may so express it, he has a right to be proud.")</span>
<span>("That is very true," replied Elizabeth, "and I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine."</span>)
</span><span>3. "Well,"
said Charlotte, "I wish Jane success with all my heart; and if she were
married to him to-morrow, I should think she had as good a chance of
happiness as if she were to be studying his character for a twelvemonth. <span>(Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance.
If the dispositions of the parties are ever so well known to each other
or ever so similar beforehand, it does not advance their felicity in
the least.)</span> -- (<span>They
always continue to grow sufficiently unlike afterwards to have their
share of vexation; and it is better to know as little as possible of the
defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life.<span>")
</span></span></span></span>
I think the answers are all the options of excerpts 1. & 2.
Please discuss in comments
Answer:
to protect people from the vauras
Answer:
<em>This kind of argument represents either or fallacy</em>
Explanation:
<em>It is also called black and white fallacy, excluded middle, false dilemma or false dichotomy. This fallacy occurs when a writer or speaker, builds an argument upon the assumption that there are only two choices or possibilities or possible outcomes when actually there are several.</em>
<h3>What is review?</h3>
A review article may also be referred to as a review of literature or a literature review. It is a review of earlier studies that have been done on the subject. It need to include a summary of the most recent research on the subject. Additionally, it won't include any brand-new experimental findings, unlike an original study report. The purpose of writing a review of literature is to offer a critical assessment of the data from previous research. Review papers might point up prospective directions for future study, and occasionally they will derive novel insights from the data already available.
#SPJ4
Don’t do it, is the correct answer
