1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
7

Had you been alive in 1965, which approach to civil rights would you have supported—King's nonviolent resistance approach or Jac

kson's law and order approach? Why?
History
1 answer:
fenix001 [56]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I would have supported Kings nonviolent resistance approach.

Explanation:

I would use his approach because of the goal of the approach which is to promote change in the society without violence of any kind.

His approach made the people more active and vocal in demanding for equal rights in a nonviolent way.

Dr. King led this movement in the late 1950’s and ‘60s to achieve legal equality for African-

Americans in the United States.

The power of words and other acts of nonviolence, like protests, grassroots organizing, and civil disobedience were the strategies Martin Luther King used to achieve his goals. He lead campaigns against poverty and international conflict. He also maintained that men and women in all parts of the world, regardless of skin color or creed, are equal members of the society.

You might be interested in
Homer’s epic, the Iliad, is about
storchak [24]

Answer:

it recounts some of the significant events of the final weeks of the Trojan War and the Greek siege of the city of Troy

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
When did the Interstate Commerce Act become law? 1877 1887 1897
geniusboy [140]
The Interstate Commerce Act become law in 1887.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does khrushchev accuse kennedy of using to get what he wants?
Rzqust [24]
Answer b on edge got it right
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is true?
den301095 [7]

Answer: plant leaves absorb carbon dioxide

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Were plantation owners with many slaves considered wealthy?
vova2212 [387]

yes, because they had more slaves they could get a lot of their work done faster and this helped them produce more materials faster as well. they never ran out of materials because the slaves were always working fast. this made the plantation owners very rich.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was NOT a factor in the decline of the Roman Empire?
    6·1 answer
  • The Spanish Armada:_________. a. attempted to invade England. b. was a treasure fleet attacked by the English. c. was destroyed
    15·2 answers
  • States may raise money by issuing checks and balances t or false
    5·1 answer
  • What happens if no candidate receives at least 270 votes from the Electoral College? Conduct research of secondary sources to as
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these statements is true?
    13·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINlIEST!
    12·1 answer
  • What prompted the end of the all-black towns in Oklahoma? spread of segregation policies in the south more opportunities in othe
    13·1 answer
  • Manifest destiny was realized in the mid-1800s in various ways. With the Oregon territory, it was through negotiation. With the
    7·2 answers
  • What cause americans to begin to resent foreigners​
    14·1 answer
  • Allied leaders sought to address the sudetenland conflict by.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!