1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leviafan [203]
3 years ago
11

Recall the text’s definition of diminishing marginal utility: "the common pattern that each marginal unit of a good consumed pro

vides less of an addition to utility than the previous unit." The reason for this behavior is because of biology. Our body sends our brains a signal once too much of a good or service has been consumed. This prevents a person from literally eating until they explode. In your own experience, share two times instances where the law of diminishing marginal utility applied to you. Can you think of any time when the law of diminishing marginal utility failed for someone? Please answer in 150 words or more. Use your own words - please do not copy and paste from a web site. Be sure to reference your sources.
Business
1 answer:
son4ous [18]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Explanation:</u>

Note, the term diminishing marginal utility refers to an economic principle that states that the more unit of a particular commodity or service we consume, the more the satisfaction (utility) derived out of the consumption reduces or diminishes.

For instance, if I watched movies produced by a particular entertainment company for several days (eg Disney Studios), I may become dissatisfied using this particular entertainment provider and may decide to try another service (Netflix).

Another instance could occur after exercising, I'm given 3 bottles of coke, after taking my first bottle, the amount of utility I derive would reduce until I get to the third bottle, at this point I've reached my peak.

The law of diminishing marginal utility failed for someone I know who had used the same type of toothpaste and brushed her teeth at least once a day for a period of over 10 years.

You might be interested in
Headland Co. has a held-to-maturity investment in the bonds of Schuyler Corp. with a carrying value of $79,200. Headland determi
Allisa [31]

Answer:

The Journal Entry is as follows:

Loss on Impairment $8,400

Debt Investment ($8,400)

Explanation:

Given.

Carrying Value = $79,200

Decreased Value = $70,800

Differences = $79,200 - $70,800

Differences = $8,400

Since the loss in value is determined, uncollectible.

The required entry on the journal entry are the amount loss on impairment and the amount invested on debt.

The Journal Entry is as follows:

Loss on Impairment $8,400

Debt Investment ($8,400)

7 0
3 years ago
At the most basic level, a business is simply a device for
9966 [12]
A business is a device for the exchange of goods
3 0
3 years ago
What factors will determine the sizes of the​ shortages? The extent of the excess demand implied by the shortages will depend on
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

The answer is: C) the elasticity of​ demand, where the shortages will be larger if demand is more inelastic.

Explanation:

When the demand for a product is completely inelastic it means that the quantity demanded for that product will be the same whether its price increases or decreases. Rarely any product is completely inelastic, but inelasticity shows a tendency of buyers to keep buying a product even if its price rises, for example gasoline.

Inelastic products don´t follow the law of supply and demand, since the price doesn´t alter the demand.

If suppliers can produce enough goods (product shortages) and the quantity demanded stays the same, the price will rise. But if the demand for the product is inelastic then the shortage will get worse since every time more people will want to buy the product and their will be less product to buy.

6 0
3 years ago
Mosler Company has compiled this information for a new project:Initial investment: $229,700Fixed costs: $66,800Variable costs: $
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

15,684.97 units

Explanation:

Given that

Initial investment = $229,700

Project life = 4 year

Fixed cost = $66,800

Price variable cost = $5.07

Selling price = $12.99

Variable costs = $5.07

The computation of break-even point is shown below:-

Depreciation = Initial investment ÷ Project life

= $229,700 ÷ 4

= $57,425

Break even point = (Fixed cost + Depreciation) ÷ (Price variable cost)

= ($66,800 + $57,425) ÷ ($12.99 - $5.07)

= 15,684.97 units

8 0
3 years ago
Long-term contracts for both warehousing and transportation requirements will be more effective if the demand and price of wareh
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

long term means it will be used for a long time thus if the price is not constant and keeps rising it wont be effective

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Park &amp; Company was recently formed with a $5,400 investment in the company by stockholders. The company then borrowed $2,400
    15·1 answer
  • Why are entrepreneurs considered both spark plugs and catalysts of the free enterprise economy?
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly
    11·1 answer
  • Net capital spending is equal to:_________.
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose that the opportunity-cost ratio for fish and lumber is 1F ≡ 1L in Canada but 2F ≡ 1L in Iceland. Then ____________ shoul
    12·1 answer
  • g There are three types of people in the town of Santa Barbara: 13 type A, 25 type B, and 32 type C. Everyone in the town loves
    7·1 answer
  • A convenience store has made up 20 grab bag gifts and is offering them for $3 a bag. 9 bags contain merchandise worth 50 cents.
    14·2 answers
  • The theory of comparative advantage states that:
    14·1 answer
  • Which education and qualifications are especially useful for Food Products and Processing Systems careers? Check all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • An effective marketing mix for the product industry is the _____.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!