Sod is related to a lodge in the sense that sod can be made into cabins and dwellings.
Hope this helps and please give brainliest!
Answer:
Technology has had a very significant impact on product and service design. ... The improved technology also made it easier to implement, remanufacture, design for assembly, design for disassembly, and design for recycling.
There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.
Answer:
3.The oranges on the window seal along with the statue of St. Margaret, the saint of childbirth, might allude to the desire for a child.
Explanation:
Actually, the decorations on the window seal revealed not only their wealth but how educated they were and what they can spend their money on.
So, No. 3 statement DOES NOT apply to the Arnolfini Portrait by Jan Van Eyck.
The little dog at her feet in the painting symbolizes and demonstrates fidelity and loyalty among the couples.
Madame de Pompadour in the 18th century when she was the official chief mistress of King Louis XV of France in several of portraits included a small black dog. It is a classical artistic motif which is obviously used by her in most of her portraits. She used it as a symbol of fidelity.
The portrait also symbolized that he was committing the business of the home to the wife while he was away.
Furthermore, Van Eyck used linear perspective to create the room in which the couple reside.
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
