Muhammad Ali, also known as Cassius Clay before he converted to the Muslim religion, was a professional Boxer. He became an American heavyweight champion boxer, and it is also considered by almost all sports writers around the world as the greatest sport figure of the 20th century.
Muhammad Ali´s boxing career expanded for 21 years, and was the first boxer to win the heavyweight title in three different occasions. Also, he participated in the Olympic games and won a gold medal for the United states. Muhammad Ali became famous because he was a sport hero an a civil rights spokesman. A will be the correct answer.
Because of his outspokenness in political issues as well well as race and religion, he became a very controversial individual, and peopled loved him for that.
His heavyweight championship was taken away from him in 1964, when he refused to go to military service because of his religious beliefs. Also, he was banned from boxing competitions for 3 years.
At least 10 to 15 black soldiers, including some slaves, fought against the British at the battles of Lexington and Bunker Hill.
Answer:
How did the Virginia and New Jersey plans come together as a compromise?
The Virginia Plan was used, but some ideas from the New Jersey Plan were added. The Connecticut Compromise established a bicameral legislature with the U.S. House of Representatives apportioned by population as desired by the Virginia Plan and the Senate granted equal votes per state as desired by the New Jersey Plan.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
