2. The concert has been postponed.
3. The computer is being used at the moment.
4. The conversation was being recorded.
5. When we got to the stadium we found out that the game had been canceled. (I’m not sure if you can use we, if you can’t, use this sentence: “The game at the stadium has been canceled.”)
6. When we got to the stadium we found out that the stadium is building a new ring road around the city. (Again I’m not sure if you can use we, if you can’t, use this sentence: “The stadium is building a new ring road around the city.”)
7. A new hospital was built near the airport.
Answer:
The poetic device being used in the excerpt is:
A. rhyme
Explanation:
We can define rhyme as the repetition of ending sounds in words, especially words that are at the end of poetry lines. Let's use the first lines of the excerpt as an example:
Fairy king, attend and mark:
I do hear the morning lark.
The words "mark" and "lark" sound quite similar, right? That is because they have the same final sounds /ark/, the only difference between them being the first consonant sound of each /m/ and /l/. This is an example of rhyme.
The same happens in the other lines, with the pairs "soon" and "moon", "flight" and "night", and "found" and "ground".
Answer:
These first few weeks of online school have been out of this world its been hard like a football game.Sometimes i wish i could throw this sickness out like the trash. Its been very hard trying to figure everything out and how to do all of these new things.But it has taught me sometimes doing different things are helpful. Now i will be better as using tech so when i take online collage courses i will be on fire! I used the following figurtave launguge: Metphor simile and hyberbole!
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
