1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Charra [1.4K]
3 years ago
15

Whats the major difference between an absolute monarch and a constitutional monarch

History
2 answers:
Ratling [72]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In the absolute monarchy, the monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers, whereas in the constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a hereditary or elected monarch , this is the main difference.

Maurinko [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The difference between a absolute monarch and a constitutional monarch is that an absolute monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers and controls everything and his word is absolute. While a constitutional monarch is elected within a state allowing people to have some sort of power on what they choose.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the apostle Paul encourage the spread of Christianity?
Julli [10]
There are several ways in which the apostle Paul encouraged the spread of Christianity, but the main way was that he sent out missionaries. 
8 0
4 years ago
***BRAINLIEST TO FIRST ANSWERER***
Fofino [41]
 Best Answer:  Economic crisis. When countries are collapsing they always choose dictators because democracies work very slow.<span>
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Can someone explain what this means.
fenix001 [56]
This excerpt comes from a famous speech by Senator Douglas in the days leading up to the Civil War, in which he was making a point that the issue of slavery should be left up to the individual states, through a process of popular sovereignty. 
6 0
3 years ago
HELPPPPP PLEASEEE!!!!!!
lianna [129]

The Civil Rights Act of 1968 is a little different from the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In legal circles, it is commonly known as the Fair Housing Act. In essence, what the '68 Act did was to make it illegal to discriminate in housing decisions based on race, religion, national origin, etc. This all stemmed from generations of a practice called "redlining" wherein agents wouldn't show people of color housing in particular areas. The '68 Act has been widely used  to bring attention to the problem of housing discrimination but has not solved the problem. Housing discrimination remains a problem throughout the United States.

The '68 Act also makes it a federal crime to hurt or intimidate anyone based on their race, color, religion, etc. This is the origin of many hate crime bills.

6 0
4 years ago
"African cultural values are but wishful thinking" Discuss this statement in the context of modernity and the call to return to
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

BLM means Black lifes Matter

Explanation:

Your welcome

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the strength of Yoritomo's leadership
    9·1 answer
  • How many states eventually voted in the favor of ratifying the Constitution
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following countries is most known for its accomplished naval force?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Enlightenment and American Revolution change the way people viewed their relationship to their rulers
    6·1 answer
  • When parking uphill on a street with no curb, how should your front wheels be positioned?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the difference between the Medicare and Medicaid program
    5·2 answers
  • 4. Describe the major turning point in Gandhi's life which moved him toward becoming an activist.
    8·1 answer
  • What kind of government did the Romans begin?
    8·2 answers
  • Was Barack Obama a good president? Why or why not?<br><br> Im not American sooo... pleasee
    14·1 answer
  • What constitutional idea supported by Plessy v. Ferguson's interpretation of the 14th Amendment was overturned by Brown v. Board
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!