<span>The </span>Fall of the Western Roman Empire<span> (commonly
known as </span>Fall of the Roman Empire<span> or </span>Fall
of Rome) was the period of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which it disintegrated and split
into numerous successor states. By 476 CE, when Odoacer deposed the Emperor Romulus, the Western Roman Empire wielded negligible military,
political, or financial power and had no effective control over the scattered
Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Invading
"barbarians" had established their own polities on most of the area
of the Western Empire. While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its
cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to
rise again.
Hiya,
Social Darwinism<span> is "a 19th-century theory, inspired by Darwinism, by which the social order is accounted as the product of natural selection of those persons best suited to existing living conditions."
So, I'm going to say your answer is: People compete for social stations based on their natural talents.
Hope this helps :)
</span>
<span>1.It failed because every colony had their own agenda. New York largely spoke Dutch. New England was largely still puritan.
2.The southern colonies were mostly big plantations, either tobacco, rice, or cotton, and they were run differently than the northern system of small farms and early industry. Pennsylvania was largely Quaker. Maryland accepted Catholics. 3.New England Puritans hated Quakers, Catholics, and Anglicans. Catholics hated all protestants. Anglicans (who were the majority in the south) hated Catholics, Puritans, and Quakers. Quakers didn't get along with anyone. Between religious and economic differences and the unwillingness of one colony to dispense money and troops to help another colony, eg. Georgia, a debtor's prison and the farthest south, wasn't going to take its eyes off of Spanish Florida just to help a bunch of Dutch-speakers in New York, the entire plan fell apart.</span>
