1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kruka [31]
3 years ago
5

An automobile manufacturer who wishes to advertise that one of its models achieves 30 mpg (miles per gallon) decides to carry ou

t a fuel efficiency test. Six nonprofessional drivers were selected, and each one drove a car from Phoenix to Los Angeles. The resulting fuel efficiencies (in miles per gallon) are given below:
27.3 29.4 31.2 28.4 30.2 29.6
Assuming that fuel efficiency is normally distributed under these circumstances, do the data contradict the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) 30 mpg? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level 0.05. (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Round your test statistic to two decimal places and your P-value to three decimal places.)
Mathematics
1 answer:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

t=\frac{29.35-30}{\frac{1.365}{\sqrt{6}}}=-1.17  

p_v =P(t_{(5)}  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.  

We can say that at 5% of significance the true mean is not significantly less than 30 so then the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) 30 mpg makes sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

The mean and sample deviation can be calculated from the following formulas:

\bar X =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

s=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i -\bar X)}{n-1}}

\bar X=29.35 represent the sample mean  

s=1.365 represent the sample standard deviation  

n=6 sample size  

\mu_o =30 represent the value that we want to test  

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.  

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)  

State the null and alternative hypotheses.  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is lower than 30 or no, the system of hypothesis are :  

Null hypothesis:\mu \geq 30  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu < 30  

Since we don't know the population deviation, is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:  

t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} (1)  

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".  

Calculate the statistic  

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:  

t=\frac{29.35-30}{\frac{1.365}{\sqrt{6}}}=-1.17  

P-value  

We need to calculate the degrees of freedom first given by:  

df=n-1=6-1=5  

Since is a one-side left tailed test the p value would given by:  

p_v =P(t_{(5)}  

Conclusion  

If we compare the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.  

We can say that at 5% of significance the true mean is not significantly less than 30 so then the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) 30 mpg makes sense

You might be interested in
Given m|n, find the value of x.<br> т<br> (6x+4)<br> (4X-14)
postnew [5]

Step-by-step explanation:

Here Is Your Answer........ please Make me as brainliest

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. A new brand of hot dog claims to have a lower sodium content than the leading brand.
kherson [118]

Answer:

(a) Population mean = 314.5mg

(b) Margin of error = 21.281mg

(c) No, 350mg is not a plausible value

The new brand of hot dog has a lower sodium content on average than the leading brand

(d) Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Population mean = (370+326+322+297+326+289+293+264+327+331)/10 = 3145/10 = 314.5mg

(b) Margin of error = t×sd/√n

sd = 29.73, n = 10, degree of freedom = n-1 = 10-1 = 9

Assuming 95% confidence level

t-value corresponding to 9 degrees of freedom and 95% confidence level is 2.262

Margin of error = 2.262×29.73/√10 = 21.281mg

(c) No

Lower limit of new brand = 314.5 - 21.281 = 293.219mg

Upper limit = 314.5 + 21.281 = 335.781mg

The range of sodium content for the new brand of hot dog is between 293.219mg and 335.781mg which is lower than the leading brand (350mg)

(d) Margin of error = t×sd/√n

From the formula above, margin of error varies inversely as the square root of sample size

The smaller the sample size (n = 10) the larger the margin of error and the less accurate is the population mean

The larger the sample size (n = 40) the smaller the margin of error and the more accurate is the population mean

8 0
3 years ago
This is a map of three towns. It shows the train line and the highway that connects the towns. The north direction is shown. The
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

  about 106 km

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between the two towns can be estimated several ways. In the attachment, we chose to measure the angles on the map. Using the law of sines, we can estimate the unknown distance.

The distance can also be estimated using the Tounouse-Avaria distance as a ruler. For best results, that ruler would need to be subdivided to an appropriate level.

__

<h3>angle measures</h3>

The angles in the triangle can be measured using a protractor or some other tool. The attachment shows the results from a geometry program:

  • ∠TMA ≈ 107°
  • ∠TAM ≈ 24°
<h3>law of sines</h3>

The law of sines tells us the distances are proportional to the sines of the opposite angles:

  TM/sin(TAM) = TA/sin(TMA)

  TM = sin(24°)×(250 km)/sin(107°) ≈ 106.3 km

The distance from Tounouse to Mt. Monotti is estimated to be about 106 km.

__

<em>Alternate solution</em>

Using a compass or dividers to project the TM distance onto TA, we find it is between 0.4 and 0.5 of the TA distance. The difference between 2×TM and TA can be estimated to be about 0.4×TM. That is, ...

  TM ≈ TA/2.4 ≈ (250 km)/2.4 ≈ 104.2 km

This estimate is consistent with the one found using angle measures.

4 0
2 years ago
ASAP please help me I need this quick <br> The question and answers are in the picture
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

maybe this will help you

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the measure or indicated arc in P​
ipn [44]

Answer:

Its 61

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • the cafeteria and what Crest Middle School is changing its menu the school council would like to know how students feel about th
    5·1 answer
  • Factor completely 3x^2-24x^2 show all work
    6·1 answer
  • Write 2/4 in simplest form
    9·1 answer
  • Write an equation of the line
    12·1 answer
  • In AVWX, V X is extended through point X to point Y, mZXVW = (3x + 13)°,
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of simple harmonic motion?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me I’m so confused
    7·1 answer
  • A 4-inch long ribbon is cut into pieces. If the length of each piece is 12of an inch, how many pieces are cut?
    9·1 answer
  • 2= n/3 what is n<br> pls helpp
    14·1 answer
  • There are 5 Germans and 5 Italians in an English class. If a group of 3 is going to be created, what is the probability that eve
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!