1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RideAnS [48]
3 years ago
9

Clement Vallandigham was: a. the Union general who turned back a Confederate invasion at Gettysburg. b. the Confederate general

who won the Battle of Chancellorsville against great odds. c. Lincoln’s first vice president. d. a northern politician banished to the Confederacy. e. hanged for treason on the orders of President Lincoln.
History
1 answer:
Radda [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Option: d. a northern politician banished to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Clement Vallandigham was a politician during the Civil War in America. He was born in Ohio in 29, July 1820. Vallandigham became a leader of the Copperhead known as anti-war Democrats. He gave his opinion against war to settle the differences between the South and the North. He was later banished to Confederacy by President Abraham Lincoln.

You might be interested in
Which three states ratified the Constitution with a wide margin of votes by the end of 1787? a. Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Georg
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Just trust me

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following generally favored a stronger national government and supported the proposed U.S. Constitution?
Shtirlitz [24]
I think D a anti federalists
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!! LOTS OF POINTS ALSO!!!
suter [353]

Answer:

Answer: d for 17   avoid war

Explanation:

they are correct please mark me brainest

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What words does the author use to describe the powers in the Constitution?
Ierofanga [76]

Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:

After listing the numerous powers granted to Congress by the Constitution the author says:

My object is to consider that undefined, unbounded and immense power which is comprised in the following clause: “And to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States; or in any department or offices thereof.” Under such a clause as this, can anything be said to be reserved and kept back from Congress? ...

In giving such immense, such unlimited powers, was there no necessity of a Bill of Rights, to secure to the people their liberties? Is it not evident that we are left wholly dependent on the wisdom and virtue of the men who shall from time to time be the members of Congress? And who shall be able to say seven years hence, the members of Congress will be wise and good men, or of the contrary character?

Answer:

The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.

Explanation:

For the author, the constitution is highly powerful, since it has the capacity to possess immense, unlimited and indefinite power. This is a concern for the population of the country, because nothing guarantees that all this relevance will not be used for evil.

The power of the constitution is managed by those who administer it, the congressmen. No one guarantees that the members of the Congress are and will be just and good people, who will use all the power of the constitution for good.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts
Radda [10]

Answer:

The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

Explanation:

Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called <em>"Wal-lam-wat-kain," </em>a Native American tribe.

Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the <em>Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.</em>

The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that <u>the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty,</u> while <u>Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.</u>

For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is important to use reply instead of new message when answering e-mail
    7·2 answers
  • What was the first state to break away from the Union after the election of President Lincoln?
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!!! Compare the emergence of advanced civilizations in Meso and South America with
    12·1 answer
  • Miningkigblllllllllllllllllllllllllhbglllllllllllll
    8·2 answers
  • During the Korean War, who joined in the fight against the UN forces
    9·1 answer
  • The federal reserve 1918
    7·1 answer
  • Why was the Mexican-American civil rights movement begun by Mexican-<br>American veterans?​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a monarch?
    13·1 answer
  • How many times Ahmed Shah Abdali invaded India?
    7·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!