1. He likely is a good chess player.
2. He plans his moves carefully.
3. He takes delight in the game of chess.
4. He likes to win.
5. He sees something very deep in the game of chess. He treats it as a challenge not brought about by his opponent, but by the game itself.
The correct answer here is the third one: Limited omniscient. We know this because a narrator who knows everything about all the characters is all knowing, or omniscient and a narrator whose knowledge is limited to one character, either major or minor, has a limited omniscient point of view.This text is a perfect example of an omniscient limited. I hope this helps
Schlosser shows transparency when he properly supports his claim by using quoted evidence. Option D is the correct one. "Robert L. Peterson , the chairman of IBP, said that moving...." ; " The move shows you...," Don Weswley told the Omaha World -Herald; " They take whatever....."
The question above wants to assess your reading and writing ability and for that reason, it is not correct for me to write this text for you, but I will show you how to write it.
First, you must read the text that was provided as a background and understand the context so that Freckles can get to work.
You may wonder what the consequences of this work will be and what it will matter in Freckles' life.
It is important to remember that the text must be written from the first-person point of view. In this case, you should pay attention to the following information:
- The first-person point of view occurs when the narrator is telling his or her story.
- In that case, you must show how Freckles tells his story from the moment he was hired.
- Show what Freckles sees, who he interacts with, and what he feels.
- Show him how he sees the impact of this job.
More information:
brainly.com/question/21210245?referrer=searchResults
False because a dissemble puts on a act by basically fooling someone
