The second answer i think??
The extent to which these rights are protected, and enumerated in the country's laws and constitution reflect the value that the society places on individual rights.
A country, such as the United States or Japan, which enshrines the individual rights of the people in the Constitution and in its laws, clearly places a high value on such rights.
A country that does not, and even goes so far as to outlaw many of these rights, such as the right of public dissent, is not a society that places a high value on such rights (examples include China, Saudi Arabia).
It should be noted that one effect of the actions taken by wealthy landowners described in the passage is enclosure acts and consolidation of small farms into large ones owned by a few farmers.
<h3>What is the passage all about?</h3>
The passage, is all about the actions and the way of life of those that are wealthy among the people in society, and these people are land owners.
Therefore, one effect of their actions is the enclosure acts and consolidation of small farms into large ones.
Learn more about passage at;
brainly.com/question/25950911
I think it is the first one
that is the only one that makes seance
