The short answer is: "to a great extent". The entire plan of the Federalists was to create a strong central government instead of having many autonomous states. Of course this occasionally went against national unity in the sense that some people were opposed to this plan, but in general they favored unity.
One form of resistance was slowing down the picking of cotton. Slaves would intentionally go slower so that they could have an easier time in the fields. This was combatted by the Southern Plantation owners after a while by whipping the slaves severely during their first picks and then mandating that they had to pick at least as much cotton every time after.
Another form of resistance was to run away. The Underground Railroad helped thousands of slaves escape to the north and to freedom.
The strategies of the Union and Confederacy differ during the Civil War as the Union beloved in a unitary country that was free from slavery.
<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>
After the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, the Union's basic purpose of unification was revised to include the abolition of slavery. Throughout the entire conflict, the Confederacy's main objectives were to incorporate all slave states, secede from the Union, endure, and protect its territory.
The Anaconda Plan aimed to totally encircle the Southern region, blockade the Atlantic Ocean, and take control of the Mississippi, obstructing trade with the area and compelling the residents of the region to capitulate.
Therefore, the strategies of the Union and Confederacy differ during the Civil War as the Union beloved in a unitary country that was free from slavery.
Learn more about Confederacy on:
brainly.com/question/951920
#SPJ1
It should be noted that Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.
<h3>How did Laissez Faire related to Industrial Revolution politically? </h3>
Laissez Faire can be see to have effect on the Industrial Revolution by taking power from the government even the allowance to interfere in the businesses is not given.
More also, Laissez-faire which is been referred to as the policy of minimum governmental interference that is been seen in the economic affairs of individuals as well as the society.
In conclusion, the doctrine of laissez-faire can be seen to be associated with the economists Physiocrats, from France from year 1778,therefore, It should be noted that Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.
Learn more about laissez-faire from
brainly.com/question/17259480
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
The First inaugural address was delivered on Monday, March 4, 1861, as part of his taking of the oath of office for his first term as the President of the United States in which he was asking for the preservation of the Union during a perilous time, he called for compromise from both his supporter in the NORTH and without further alienating the South but making his point known (“<em>In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war</em>)He likewise declared secession to be wrong ;promised not to interfere with the institution of slavery where it existed.
However,Abraham Lincoln has a dispassionate for slavery,rejecting the South's defense of slavery; this stand eventually lead to the outbreak of the American Civil War.
At the time of Lincoln’s second inaugural address, the civil war is also most coming to an end and the Union’s victory over the South was imminent. Because of this the second speech was based on resolution,also reaffirming a faith in God's will and healing a once-divided nation
