Answer:
They have tended to settle in poor areas of larger cities.
Everyone has the different idea from one and other, and it is good to have different opinion about the things.
<h3>Why are the reason of
clashes between the two people?</h3>
The reason of the clashes between the two people are the different set of minds, which people have. We all have different ideology and thinking in every situation and that is okay to have the different, there is not one right or wrong.
Thus, Everyone has the different idea from one and other,
For more details about clashes between the two people, click here:
brainly.com/question/2837579
#SPJ1
Answer:
progressive Imperialism
Explanation:
According to Progressive Imperialism, the policy of extending the influence to regions in the world under the justification of opening trade becomes the norm. The military supremacy of the US enabled them to set conditions for expanding the markets to areas of the world were formerly there was only local or regional trade and together with the effort to gain economic control comes the political control exerted upon the Panama channel.
As more and more areas of influence come to be dictated by the logics of economic , the foreign policy focuses on using diplomatic means and if this fails the hard politics through military intervention and war are set.
The amount of territory the US currently has would have been completely different if the national government could only legislate based on what is written in the constitution.
A perfect example of this is the power to purchase land/territories from other countries. This was first done by Thomas Jefferson with the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. The US Constitution does not say that the president has the power to buy land from other countries. However, Jefferson said that this power was "implied" by the Constitution.
This idea of an implied power greatly changed the presidency/national government. Several presidents after Jefferson would follow his lead by making deals with countries for territory.
If it wasn't for this concept of implied powers, the US may not have grown to the 50 states we know it as today.
Yes i do, what you need help with
