The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the name of the individual who expresses the argument of liberty. Who are you referring to?
It could be anyone, A politician, a founding father, a diplomat, a freedom fighter, a Patriot. Who?
Trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Doing some research, there is a concept of Liberty expressed by Federalists Founding Father James Madison in one of the Federalist's Papers. James Madison wrote: "Liberty... is essential to [factions] existence”
What Madison tried to say with that quote was that every faction was the product of a way of thinking, of a political belief system expressed with liberty. And that political factions were the result of the ideas of men who freely decided what could be the best for the country and that is why they formed factions or political parties, to support these ideas and present them to the American people.
I believe it’s A because president Lincoln was the first republican president that face the reconstruction of voting rights for blacks after the civil war
That expansion of slavery was a major problem for the nation
The increased agricultural production of the 18th century can be traced to four interrelated factors:The increased availability of farmland.A favorable climate.More livestock.Improved crop yield.
Answer:
revolutionary movement (or revolutionary social movement) is a specific type of social movement dedicated to carrying out a revolution. Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it".[1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works[2][need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".[3]
A social movement may want to make various reforms and to gain some control of the state, but as long as they do not aim for an exclusive control, its members are not revolutionary.[4] Social movements may become more radical and revolutionary, or vice versa - revolutionary movements can scale down their demands and agree to share powers with others, becoming a run-of-the-mill political party.[4]
