1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kenny6666 [7]
3 years ago
11

1.) Which of the following reasons BEST identifies why a treaty was needed concerning the continent of Antarctica?

History
2 answers:
gtnhenbr [62]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is the <span>bicameral</span>
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
7 0
I think 1 is C), not positive though.

2 I am pretty sure is A

You might be interested in
With regard to which of the following documents was the executive privilege exercised? A. Neutrality Proclamation B. Franco-Amer
Svetlanka [38]

A. Neutrality Proclamation. GOOD LUCK

5 0
3 years ago
How did the location of constantinople, the capital of byzantine, help the empire's expansion?
adelina 88 [10]
Byzantine empire fight for Roman empire
7 0
3 years ago
The U.S. foreign policy illustrated in this cartoon was intended to -
sergey [27]
ANSWER: A


EXPLAINATION:
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In India, what was Gandhi’s original focus to fight against?
mezya [45]

It was his campaign against British Control of salt production

6 0
4 years ago
Why does Clay think that accepting Texas as a state would end up “strengthening one part
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it  then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union

Explanation:

Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it  then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes trade in the Inca Empire?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the spoils system?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe what Nationalism looks like in the United states today
    9·1 answer
  • The major problems that face U. S. education are mediocrity, grade inflation, social promotion, functional illiteracy, faked dat
    6·1 answer
  • Pros and cons of “dollar diplomacy” in Latin American development
    5·1 answer
  • In five to ten sentences, describe how Islam and Christianity have impacted the world in positive ways?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these is the largest difference between developed and developing
    13·2 answers
  • How did man enter North America?
    9·1 answer
  • Which one of these has nothing todo with the others? and why
    10·1 answer
  • – The first English factory set up on the banks of –
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!