One would be to represent their own ideas how a government should run the country.
I know that John Locke is natural rights
Lincoln reasoned out that there were insurgent agents who were intent on destroying the Union without war but there were parties who would rather wage war and have an easy triumph.
Here is his reason:
"While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving<span> the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to </span>destroy<span> it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would </span>make<span> war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would </span>accept<span> war rather than let it perish, and the war came." - President Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address March 4, 1865.</span>
New england bc of how it is down there
The French people rose up and killed all the there aristocrats and royalty which upset aristocrats and royals from other European countries for several reasons. The rebellion gave their counties commoners dangerous ideas about rebelling themselves and also all the aristocrats were related regardless of what country they ruled.
