Whether judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's original ruling
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Normally the cases that come to Supreme Court are the ones that had been appealed for justice to review case from lower courts. The Supreme Court does not take any case just like that it takes up the case only if there is any breach in the federal law or any issue that is involving state laws.
Before heard by the Supreme Court it asks for details to be submitted with evidence by the trial court. Cases which involves national attention and needs a trial will be taken by the Supreme Court. If the case was influenced by judicial activism it is appeal-able to the Supreme Court. The Supreme court then resolves this case.
Voyages and of exploration
Explanation:
El proceso de construcción histórica del Estado moderno no consistió solamente en un desplazamiento de otras instituciones, sino su completa renovación, su predominio con las nuevas autoridades de la nación, creando un orden social nuevo (liberal, burgués y capitalista) al eliminarse las otras formas estamentales
In the late Republic, male slaves who were granted their freedom could become full citizens. Around 90 B.C.E., non-Roman allies of the Republic gained the rights of citizenship, and by 212 C.E, under the Edict of Caracalla, all free people of the Roman Empire could become citizens.
Winston Churchill was a great leader of the UK and basically stopped hitlers conquer of Europe
