Answer:
Um, is this supposed to be a joke or do you actually need help? Don't worry I feel you, everyday is as boring as the last.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
If you have a real question then post it too!
Answer:
C. An article in Newsweek describing the budget cuts.
D. White House's entry on the budget cuts.
Explanation:
Mary should consider "Newsweek's article" to strengthen her point and point out the reasons leading to the budget cuts in Education and its consequences. This would assist Mary to substantiate her points and convey it more emphatically.
The White House website's entry on the budget cuts would provide authenticity to her claims and assist her in relating to it with more credibility. This would also help her present the comparison and contrast among the previous budget cuts in Education and its impact that would bring out the flaws of the Government on the surface.
Thus, both the two arguments would aid Mary in persuading the readers about the "budget cuts in education" and compel them to think and take necessary actions like a protest or anything against this.
Answer:
Because France could not handle the power of armored columns
Explanation:
In the attack, Germany had "columns" of armored cars, and their strategy was vital to win the battle. Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Britain at the time, recognized that, and according to him, that was the reason why France lost the battle.
