Answer:
because the more population the south had the more members of congress they would have .
Explanation:
Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
I'm pretty sure it's either A or B. I hope this helps!
Answer:
i think trans-Atlantic Slave Trade im not sure tho
Explanation:
The decision was taken by the US Supreme Court in the case Marbury v. Madison makes the US democracy more stable.
In this case, Marbury v. Madison the US Supreme Court declared that is the job of the US Supreme Court to rule if a law is constitutional or not. This puts limits on the Congress power and it is one of the limits given to the judiciary branch by the checks and balances system. This makes democracy more stable because the Constitution is the base of everything and it will be preserved.
