It might be said that by resorting to these techniques, the character is presented and portrayed. The reader gets to know her and the way she thinks. In this way, she is able to reveal her authority about certain subjects, such as "husband" and the desire a woman could have of controlling him. Her tale might be seen as consistent and factual because it is a personal experience so she gets to speak due to her knowledge about the topic.
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
The answer will be true. Whenever you are writing a narrative, you have to provide some sort of description throughout it.
<span>They are determined to advance freedom because the speaker has been confined</span>
Answer:
·
In Julie of the Wolves, the character known as both Miyax and Julie exhibits many
Explanation:
