Answer:
O Robert F. Foster: Modern Ireland 1600-1972. Dublin, 2011 is the correct citation
Explanation:
Answer:
the correct answer is
Fortunato's name itself is a situational and dramatic irony; his name means "fortunate," but his fate is not to be at all fortunate.
Explanation:
<em><u>h</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
That's called a Atlas.
Another is A Road Map. :))
Communicate. Open communication is key in a dispute.
Actively Listen. Listen to what the other person has to say, without interrupting.
Review Options. Talk over the options, looking for solutions that benefit everyone. ...
End with a Win-Win Solution.
The sentence that best integrates information from two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows ..."
<h3>How to integrate two or more sources?</h3>
In writing, integrating sources implies using different reliable sources to support an idea or better explain an issue. If sources present contradictory information, the best is to:
- Briefly state the idea each source supports to show the contradiction between sources.
- Mention the type of source in each case (book, article, blog, etc.).
<h3>What is the best option?</h3>
The best option to integrate the two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows examples of U.S. states..."
The main reasons are:
- This mentions the type of sources (articles).
- This states why these are contradictory rather than only mentioning they have opposite information.
Learn more about reliable sources in: brainly.com/question/12203238
