I would assume it to be, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces"..
If you're talking about World War I then the federal government implemented the Espionage and Sedition acts. These laws limited the freedom of speech for American citizens. The Espionage and Sedition Acts allowed for the arrest of individuals who spoke against the war effort or promoted avoiding the draft.
If you're referring to World War II, Japanese-American citizens had their freedoms limited after the attack on Pearl Harbor. After the attack by the Japanese military on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. This allowed the government to forcibly remove any individual in a military area. In this case, Japanese-American citizens are removed from their homes on the West Coast and forced into internment camps. These internment camps were restrictive, as Japanese-American citizens could not leave and return to their homes until the war is over.
The conclusion about the use of U.S. military power would be most logically drawn from the experience of the Iraq War is: <span>A. After a military victory, the defeated country may remain unstable and dangerous.
After we use military power to obliterate the leader of these terrorist groups that controlled the middle east we should not directly leave and not doing some follow up because it will create a politcal vacuum and invited many people from other groups see this as an opportunity to gain power.</span>
<u>1. The correct answer is B. It inspired similar boycotts in other cities across the nation. </u>
This event was very significant in the civil rights movement which started in the 1950's. It captured the attention of the entire nation. People around the country were made aware of the event because it was launched on a massive scale.
<u>2. The correct answer is A. used nonviolent resistance effectively.</u>
The boycott had to immediate consequences: 1. It was a solid example for other protests in Southern states that followed 2. It demonstrated the potential for nonviolent mass protest to successfully defy racial discrimination.
<u>3. The correct answer is C. The Montgomery Bus Boycott.</u>
<em><u>Greensboro sit-in</u></em> happened in 1960, five years after and there's no evidence of direct connection. <em><u>NAACP</u></em> was formed on 1909, so <u>Bus Boycott</u> didn't have any influence and finally, <em><u>the March in Washington for Jobs and Freedom </u></em>was held August 28, 1963, eight years later and not immediately. On the other hand, <u>the boycott in Montgomery</u> began on December 5th (four days after<em><u> Rose Park's arrest)</u></em>, and it was an evident success. About 90 percent of the blacks who usually rode the buses joined the boycott.
<u>4. The correct answer is B. The Montgomery Improvement Association.</u>
Black community leaders like <em><u>Ralph Abernathy, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Edgar Nixon</u></em>, formed on December 5, 1955, the Association to guide and oversee the <u>Montgomery bus boycott</u>.