1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dovator [93]
3 years ago
9

1. Does the poem exhibit the speaker's love for her father or her hatred of him? Explain. 2. What type of man does the speaker m

arry (see lines 61 - 70)? 3. How does the speaker characterize her husband and her father in the last two stanzas? Might the "Daddy" of the last line of the poem refer to something more than the speaker's father? Explain. 4. What emotional associations does the title "Daddy" possess? Are those associations reinforced or contradicted by the poem? 5. Do you like this poem? Why, or why not?
English
1 answer:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
3 0

Answers:

1. The poem exhibits the speaker's hatred for the father: Lines 6, 7, 41 revealed that she had wanted to kill her father and was always scared of him. She won't want to kill someone she loved. So, the poem depicted hatred for the father. In lines 1-4 the poet compares herself to a foot that was stuck in her father's black shoe. She makes use of this imagery to imply and explain how she has been crushed by her father emotionally for 30 years.

2. She married a man who was just like her father. She termed the man - a vampire who made her to suffer for seven years. The man brought back the memories of what she passed through in the hands of her father.

3. She characterized them as vampires.The "Daddy" of the last line refers to her father as a "b***". At the close of the poem, she decides to stop chasing her father.

4. The title "Daddy" possesses an intimate and loving emotional connection, a father-daughter association. But that kind of association was contradicted in the poem but rather depicted a tyrant father.

5. No! This is because the poem didn't depict any form of forgiveness. It was written out of a battered, bruised and betrayed heart and didn't depict the need for true forgiveness.

Explanation:

“Daddy”, a poem written by Sylvia Plath. Plath was a famous American poet and novelist who wrote ‘Daddy’, a very famous literary piece. This poem speaks about her father and her ordeal in his hands.  It also presents the speaker’s grief over the loss of her father. It was first published in 1965.

You might be interested in
Why does Carnegie think occupying the Philippines will cost the United States money?
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

c) It will require the United States to spend money to defend the islands.

Explanation:

Carnegie believes that conquering the Philippines would cost the US money because it will require the US to spend money defending the islands from foreign invasion.

5 0
2 years ago
Which literary technique does the stanza demonstrate?
vivado [14]
Parallelism --> which is basically a uniform sturcture. 
so in this poem, the author has a structure that contains a past tense verb and ends with a certain body part. 

past tense verbs: brushed, bathed, drawm
body partsL hair, hands, feet
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help I need this asap
asambeis [7]

Answer: Compassionate

Explanation:

  1. Petulant is incorrect because it means that the volunteers were bad - tempered and volunteers usually are generous.
  2. Clear is incorrect because it is stating that the volunteers were understanding when they were gathering over 100 boxes of food.
  3. Both compassionate and resolute would be good answers for this question since resolute means determined and compassionate means a feeling of concern towards others. However, compassionate would be a better choice since the volunteers are putting all this effort in to help the physical needs (food) of the people in the local pantry.
4 0
3 years ago
ANSWER ASAP!!!!<br> "How and when does imagination overcome reason?"
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

Imagination overcomes reason when the desire or need for something to be true, or the fear that something is true, is stronger than the persuasive power of logic and observation.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One way to interpret the gods in Greek myths is to see them as personifications of forces in
Korolek [52]

Personification of God could result in the use of some of literary elements in the story like similes and metaphors.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Baldwin thought that God even in Greek could not be personified as other elements such as fire, ice, sea and so on. But because of this believe of Baldwin, God was believed and thought just to be normal and not personified.

But because of this use of personification, there was use of some of the literary elements in the story like that of similes and metaphors in the story where there is some kind of comparison of God with personifications and other elements.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statements about the gerund in the sentence below are true? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Please answer this correctly
    11·2 answers
  • Answer this question, i really don't know right answer and why you use this construction
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a descriptive word choice?
    14·2 answers
  • Say TRUE or FALSE
    12·2 answers
  • How does Shakespeare present the character of Macbeth in Act 2 Scene 1?
    8·1 answer
  • HELP WILL 10 POINTS AND BRAINIEST ANSWER! IF YOU ANSWER SILLY I WILL REPORT! HERE IS THE QUESTION,
    9·1 answer
  • Plz help write an essay on the topic #Help<br><br>essay 350 words​
    13·2 answers
  • 2. Which sentence best expresses the central point of the selection?
    13·1 answer
  • Pygmalion variance in class realtions
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!