This question is incomplete. The complete answer is:
Read the excerpt from Theodore Dreiser’s “My Brother Paul.” What narrative point of view does Dreiser use in this excerpt from the story?
"I had not seen my brother in three or four days, but after I had strolled a block or two up Broadway I encountered him. I have always thought that he had kept an eye on me and had really followed me; was looking, in short, to see what I would do As usual he was most smartly and comfortably dressed."
A. Second person
B. Third-person limited
C. First person
D. Third-person omniscient
The correct answer is C. First person.
Explanation
Explanation
In the narrative field, the first person refers to how one of the characters tells the story from his point of view. In this mode, the subjects I (singular) and we (plural) are used. According to the above, the previous fragment is written in the first person because whoever tells the story speaks of himself by saying "I had not seen my brother in three or four days ". According to the above, the correct answer is C. First person.
Dr. Lanyon has learned damaging new information about Dr. Jekyll. I know this because after Utterson asks if Lanyon has seen Dr Jekyll, his face changes and he says he never wants to see him again.
Answer: 1. "It was idle, he knew, to get between a fool and his folly" means that it was useless and unimportant to make a fool understand something. 2. The fool is Hal. 3. His folly was his lack of good sense, trying to wake the dogs up. 4. John Thornton thought it was non-sense to intervene because regardless of the past warnings of the ice breaking down, he still wanted to wake the dogs up and continue moving.
Explanation: In the story, the team that is traveling towards their destination encounters difficulties to cross the river. John Thornton warns them that the ice is melting and that they might sink If they continue. Despite all the tragedies and losses the team has had in the trip, Hal ignores the warnings and tries to wake the dogs up. Thornton concludes that trying to convince a fool and his lack of non-sense is useless and unimportant since there is no way Hal will understand.
Answer:
the benefits of knowing 2 languages is that when you apply for jobs you apply as being bilingual and you have a better shot at getting a position that best suits both languages that you know and you get paid an ex amount of money due to being able to speak more than 1 language and being bilingual allows you to get a job faster then people who only know a single language
