1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
3 years ago
15

What two reforms did Nicholas the 2nd introduce after the revolution of 1905? Select all the correct answers

English
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. the creation of the Duma is correct and 2. the establishment of a constitutional monarchy is the next best bet

Explanation:

Nicholas II was the one that created the Duma, and signed the Russian Constitution of 1906.

babunello [35]3 years ago
7 0

The creation of the duma

The emancipation of the serfs

You might be interested in
Which is more important: freedom or security? Do you believe there is a way to have both freedom and
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

National security is an essential factor of any functioning society, but freedom is just as important.After 9/11, security in America was taken to a new level with increased airport safety procedures, a stronger border control, and new security acts being passed.The government did need to take action, such as enforcing stricter airport regulations to better monitor who enters the country. However, they did not need to infringe on American freedoms that were fought so hard for during the Revolutionary War.The USA Patriot Act of 2001 increased the ability of law enforcement officials to search personal information such as telephone calls, e-mails and personal records. It also eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States.While some aspects of the act are necessary, others are not.The Fourth Amendment ensures "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." Listening in on phone calls and going through people's personal e-mails is unreasonable because it will not make America a safer place to live and it infringes on the freedoms the Fourth Amendment guarantees.U.S. intelligence analysts were ordered to continue monitoring phone calls, even when it was clear they posed no threat to America's safety."We identified phone numbers belonging to non-threatening groups, including the Red Cross," said Adrienne Kinne, a former Arab linguist who worked at a National Security Agency facility at Fort Gordon from 2001 to 2003. "We could have blocked their numbers, but we didn't, and we were told to listen to them just in case."American freedoms were being sacrificed to provide security, even when there was no real danger. The people whose phone calls were being monitored posed no threat to America. This was an invasion of their rights as American citizens.Freedom and security need to be balanced, but freedom should not be jeopardized in order to obtain security.In the beginning, America invested in freedom, not the security of what its citizens already knew. And while both are vital to the success of a nation, freedom is the more fundamental, more enduring, and, therefore, more important.Some may argue that, given the current threats to America, the security of the country and its people should take priority over freedoms, no matter the cost.While there are threats to be concerned about, taking away the liberty of the citizens for the sake of security is just giving in to what the terrorists ultimately want: the suppression of America and its people.These acts were supposed to secure the country and offer more protection in the tumultuous atmosphere of World War I. In reality, they not only failed but they tightened the grip that fear held on the nation. Beyond this, the acts dramatically infringed on First Amendment rights, the freedoms that are deeply ingrained in America.And while the freedom versus security debate is centuries old and circumstances have changed countless times, the dilemma is still the same. In a nation where freedom has had such a high value even before the country's birth, it is nearly impossible to place security before liberty.I consider security to be more important than freedom. For a small group of students in my school, the thoughts concerning this topic are so drastically different that it is our policy to refuse to discuss it with others when we know it will start an argument.Freedom and security do not necessarily refer to matters of national importance. They can be used in many situations. For example, when looking for a job, some people consider how secure they will be having a routine 9 to 5 job with little change in schedule. This ensures that their daily needs will be taken care of and they don't need to worry about those.Another extremely important thing having to do with security is a person's romantic relationships. Is it better to date exclusively and to have a steady boyfriend or girlfriend, or to be free to come and go as you please without having a steady relationship in your life? Personally, I'd like to think that because something like marriage exists, security is considered significantly more important to most individuals.

Some people may think that life is pointless if you aren't free to enjoy it. But I disagree. What's the point of being free if you have to live with the constant uncertainty and worry that's caused by a lack of security?

5 0
3 years ago
Describe the basic construction of a lead acid battry<br>​
Korvikt [17]

A Lead Acid Battery consists of Plates, Separator, and Electrolyte, Hard Plastic with a hard rubber case. ... These two plates are separated using a separator which is an insulating material. This total construction is kept in a hard plastic case with an electrolyte. The electrolyte is water and sulfuric acid.

8 0
3 years ago
An outline determines whether your
wel

The correct answer is True

Explanation:

Outlines show the general structure of a text including the main idea (principal point) and the details that explain this idea (supporting idea) by organizing these from more general to more specific. Due to this, creating an outline before writing a text helps the author to better organize the elements of a text. Moreover, an outline shows if the supporting ideas and other details such as examples are connected to the main idea and support it. This is possible by analyzing if each of the supporting ideas helps the author explain the main point or main idea. According to this, the statement is true.

7 0
2 years ago
Which inference can be drawn about Bilbo's character based on Chapters 9 and 10 of The Hobbit?
bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Part A:

b) He is blessed with good timing and luck.

Part B:

b) 'Poor little blighter,' said William. He had already had as much supper as he could hold; also, he had had lots of beer. 'Poor little blighter! Let him go!'

e) "The day grew lighter and warmer as they floated along. After a while, the river rounded a steep shoulder of land that came down upon their left ... Suddenly the cliff fell away. The shores sank. The trees ended. Then Bilbo saw a sight: The lands opened wide about him, filled with the waters of the river which broke up and wandered in a hundred winding courses."

Explanation:

Based on chapter 9 and 10, we can infer that Bilbo is blessed with timing and luck.  

In the line that starts with 'poor little blighter...', Bilbo is lucky because as he gets caught up, he does not end up being cooked because at that time, William had just eaten and was full of food and beer.

In the second instance, "The day grew lighter and warmer as they floated along......, Bilbo finally got to see the lonely mountain that he had come far to see. There, felt fortunate as he listened to the information that the raftsmen let fall.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy? The speaker uses anecdotal evidence with phras
MrRissso [65]

Fallacy is the use of faulty arguments which are not valid and as such are <em>rendered untrue </em>because of the way they are presented in the argument. <em>Some fallacies look valid,</em> but are still fallacious because <em>they do not satisfy</em> an important logical premise.

As a result of this, we can see that there are various types of fallacy and they include:

  • Fallacy of Hasty Generalisation
  • Argumentum ad Baculum
  • Argumentum ad Hominem
  • Slippery Slope

For example, when we use Argumentum ad Baculum (appeal to force), we try to make use of force to silence a person who has made a very valid and logical argument.

For example, when you tell a person, "I will soon slap you if you do not close up your mouth" is an appeal to force or Argumentum ad Baculum

Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview so that you would get a better understanding of the concept.

Read more about fallacy here:

brainly.com/question/20939336

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Both Keats and Shelley celebrated _____ in their poetry. beauty life freedom protest
    10·2 answers
  • You can ________ slugs from damaging your plants by spraying toxic chemicals or creating a barrier to your garden. Or you can fi
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40 PTS FOR THIS The Supercontinent Mystery 1 Alfred Wegener was a brilliant meteorologist who had comp
    14·2 answers
  • Which example does Forster use to illustrate the concept of causality
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence is most clearly from a critique?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP WILL GIVE BRAINIEST AND 20 POINTS!!! EXPLAIN THROUGHLY AND GIVE 5-6 SENTENCES, WHY DID PEOPLE WANT/VOTE KAMALA HARRIS BECOM
    12·1 answer
  • What would be an example of foreshadowing in a story about a magician who
    5·1 answer
  • Changing Perspective
    15·1 answer
  • HELP IM TO LAZYYYY : (
    10·2 answers
  • In Freudian theory, which one of the following is an example of an Eros instinct, which includes survival, social cooperation, a
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!