Answer:
The amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Explanation:
Since amortization is assumed to be recorded at the end of each year, this can be calculated as follows:
Annual amortization expense = Cost of the patent / Patent's estimated useful life = $90,000 / 10 = $9,000
Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = Annual amortization expense * 3 years = $9,000 * 3 = $27,000
Unamortized cost of patent charge against income during year 4 = Cost of the patent - Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = $90,000 - $27,000 = $63,000
Therefore, the amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Answer:
The correct answer is
b) Consent agreement signed by employees.
good luck ❤
That statement would be false
Reducing the number of sellers means that the quantity of the products that available in the market is also reduced
This will cause the curve to move to the left ( it goes right if the quantity of the products is increased)
Based on the fact that Forward Co. discarded a machine with cost $5,000, the entry to record this transaction in the books would include a credit to Machinery.
<h3>How do you dispose of fixed assets?</h3>
When fixed assets are to be disposed of, the accumulated depreciation upt to that point is looked at to calculate the net book value.
This would then show the company if they made a profit or a loss when they sold the fixed asset with a profit being made when the selling price is higher than the net book value.
Regardless of the price the fixed asset is sold at, the company would record a credit to the fixed asset (machinery) account to show that the fixed asset account is decreasing.
In conclusion, there will be a credit to machinery.
Find out more on disposing fixed assets at brainly.com/question/14542603
#SPJ1
Answer:
The calculations are shown below:
Explanation:
The calculations are shown below:
a. The expected rate of return is
Return = Risk free return + Beta × (Market return - risk free return)
= 5% + 1.9 × (11.20% - 5%)
= 5% + 11.78%
= 16.78%
b. Now the alpha is
Alpha = Actual rate of return - Expected rate of return
= 9.2% - 16.78%
= - 7.58%
c. No , the CAPM is not valid as the expected rate of return is more than the actual rate of return
