1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igor_vitrenko [27]
3 years ago
12

The Japanese policy of near-isolation ended in 1854 because japan:

History
1 answer:
tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

To agree to the demands of the Untied States

Explanation:

The Japanese, because of their years of isolation, had no navy with which to defend themselves, and thus they had to agree to the demands of the United States. In 1854, the Treaty of Kanagawa was signed which permitted trade and opened Japanese ports to merchant ships.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements about President Hoover's response to the Great Depression is NOT accurate?
AleksandrR [38]
The answer is D. .Hoover suggested that people tell more jokes 

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Yellow River influence the civilizations that developed there?
sveta [45]

Answer:

The Yellow River's Contribution to the World

Gunpowder, the compass, paper making, and printing - all of these inventions not only promoted Chinese cultural development, but also spread to the rest of the world, making an important contribution to the development of humankind.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help I will report if you give me nonsense answers and this is just a warning
Lelu [443]

I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.

<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>

Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.

C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.

D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.

Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D

5 0
3 years ago
What were the intolerable acts and how did the colonists respond to them
Aliun [14]

The intolerable law were five laws against american colonist by the british in 1774 as punishment for the boston tea party. So the colonist voiced their opposition on a local level.

3 0
3 years ago
During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, U.S. foreign policy was closely tied to domestic economic concerns. The annexatio
IceJOKER [234]
I just need the pionts
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The state of tension between nations without armed conflict was known as the
    11·1 answer
  • The ozzie and harriet nelson type of family was in its prime during which time period?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did factory owners do to prevent unions from forming?
    12·2 answers
  • Which geographic aspects made it easy to unify Italy?
    15·2 answers
  • Why did so many people invest in the stock market in the 1920s?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the union blockade of the southern coast affect the confederacy during the civil war
    10·1 answer
  • This excerpt from article II of the constitution describes which of the presidents major functions
    16·2 answers
  • The 13 Amendment should be passed because why?
    7·2 answers
  • What wartime circumstances strengthened the Prohibition movement?
    8·1 answer
  • HELPPPPP!!!!
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!