1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
11

The case coming on for a hearing before the Supreme Court, that court was of opinion that the law under which the prosecution ha

d was constitutional, and denied the relief prayed for by the petitioner. Ex parte Plessy, 45 La.Ann. 80. Whereupon petitioner prayed for a writ of error from this court, which was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. This case turns upon the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly of the State of Louisiana, passed in 1890, providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races. Acts 1890, No. 111, p. 152. The first section of the statute enacts "that all railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in this State shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations: Provided, That this section shall not be construed to apply to street railroads. No person or persons, shall be admitted to occupy seats in coaches other than the ones assigned to them on account of the race they belong to." The Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson was problematic because the court was not able to overturn the Louisiana state law that required passengers be separated by race. the court did not have any African American justices among its members. it was unclear if Plessy (who was of mixed race) broke the law by sitting in the whites-only coach. it was based on the belief that segregation was permissible as long as the facilities were equal.
English
1 answer:
Andre45 [30]3 years ago
6 0
The correct option is the last one - <span>it was based on the belief that segregation was permissible as long as the facilities were equal.
According to this excerpt, segregation is okay only if everything is equal for white and black citizens. So they can be separated in trains and other vehicles as long as these vehicles are of equal quality. Obviously, that opinion is problematic which is why segregation was banned many years ago.
</span>
You might be interested in
Examine Macbeth and Lady Macbeth before Duncan’s murder. In what ways are they alike and different? Explain in 8-10 sentences.
GrogVix [38]
Okay, so I am not going to write this whole thing for you, however I will compare and contrast the two. 

Lady Macbeth
She really wants her husband to carry out the murders bc she is thirsty to be queen 

Macbeth
Kinda hesitant to do it, questions if he can but let's his wife persuade him into doing it. After murdering Duncan, Macbeth kinda freaks out and leaves the daggers in Duncan's room and Lady Macbeth has to go back and fix her hubby's mistake
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In “Annabel Lee,” which word or phrase best applies to the relationship of the speaker and Annabel Lee while she is alive? Choos
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Is defiance a necessary part of growing up? Why or why not?
Maslowich
Yes. in order for true self discovery and figuring out our own limits we must push through the limits and rules we have been taught. in the process we may learn we agree with the previous set rules, or we may find our own way and form our own way of thought. No matter the outcome, defiance will lead to that point
4 0
3 years ago
On page 179 Johnny writes in a letter to Ponyboy, “You still have a lot of time to make yourself be what you want. There’s still
Natalija [7]

Answer:

We can apply it to our own lives because we've all done mistakes and bad things in our lives but we can change our ways for the better like how instead of becoming a greaser Johnny believes that Ponyboy can become good in the world. It kinda shows how in life some people have done bad things but if they change their ways starting now they can still be part of the good in the world. I hope this helps :))

5 0
3 years ago
Write about happiness and success in your opinion ​
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

According to Lyubomirsky, et al., (2005) numerous studies have shown that happy people tend to be successful across multiple domains in life, including work performance, health, income, friendship, and even marriage.

The authors have devised a conceptual model that accounts for these findings. They argue that the happiness-success link exists not only because success makes people happy, but also from the positive affect engendering success.

The study examined three classes of evidence, including:

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

Experimental

The results of the findings revealed that happiness is associated with and precedes numerous successful outcomes. Moreover, it was also discovered that certain behaviors tended to parallel that success.

The evidence suggests that the idea of positive affect, the hallmark of well-being, may actually be the cause of many of the desirable characteristics, resources, and successes correlated with such happiness.

The real question then becomes, what comes first, happiness or success? This is akin to the chicken and egg scenario as well.

If happiness comes first, then you must surmise that you have to figure out how to be happy before your success will come rolling in.

On the other side of the coin is the idea of success coming first, before happiness.

What does it take to really be happy? Do you have to be successful in order to be happy? There are most likely millions of people in the world who would disagree with you on that point because success does not guarantee happiness.

There are just as many people out there who deem themselves happy, while not necessarily successful, as there are successful people still trying to figure out how to be happy.

How do these two constructs tie together? That is the issue we will discuss.

According to the fight or flight theory, humans were not wired for happiness, they were wired for survival.

Many of us find ourselves rushing through life, chasing happiness. The problem is that we never quite get there.

For many of us, happiness is something we aspire to. Happiness is somewhere we get to someday. What we fail to recognize is that happiness is a state of mind, not a destination.

We know happiness is not a static state, because even the happiest people feel blue sometimes.

Norrish and Vella-Brodrick (2008) studied whether happiness is even a worthwhile pursuit. Happiness, the pursuit of it, and what it means to live a good life has been long debated

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on Thoreau’s beliefs and "Civil Disobedience," he most likely decided not to pay poll tax because
    10·1 answer
  • 15 points!! help!
    15·2 answers
  • What archetypal character in a story might help ensure that the protagonist finds the path to salvation?
    7·1 answer
  • Write a short essay in which you examine the figurative language in “Concrete Mixers.” Explain what the concrete mixers are comp
    15·1 answer
  • The rising action is the high point of the story.
    14·2 answers
  • WHICH LABORATORY PROVEN MEDICATION IS USED TO CONTROL HIV
    13·1 answer
  • Which type of question tests your ability to see the relationship between two given words
    12·1 answer
  • Create an appeal for this image.
    6·1 answer
  • Why teen should NOT be allowed to play violent role-playing game? ​
    7·2 answers
  • Can people with an anxiety practice their life normally​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!