Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
a day or period of celebration
typically for religious reasons
Either a or b i say B since that’s the definition of theme
Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
During his speech, Wiesel declares that the Jews, while they were captive and suffering, thought that the great leaders of the world did not know what was happening with them, because they would had stopped it.
But then, he realized that the great leaders knew it and yet did nothing.
To soften this criticism, he mentions that Franklin D. Roosevelt was undoubtedly a great leader, but nevertheless his behavior towards the Jews was flawed.
His speech talks about indifference in general, and how not being indifferent could save many lives.