Answer:
They had more confidence and economic relations with one another. The Spanish, on the other hand, did not have friendly relations with the locals. However, one thing they had in common was that the Spanish and French ultimately married local native American women, resulting in the creation of distinct communities.
The head of Hartford Convention was Harrison Gray Otis. Besides him there were 25 other participants:
George Cabot
Benjamin Hazard
Benjamin West
Calvin Goddard
Chauncey Goodrich
Daniel Lyman
Daniel Waldo
Edward Manton
George Bliss
Hodijah Baylies
James Hillhouse
John Treadwell
Joseph S. Lyman
Joshua Thomas
Mills Olcott
Nathan Dane
Nathaniel Smith
Roger Minott Sherman
Samuel Sumner Wilde
Samuel Ward, Jr.
Stephen Longfellow, Jr.
Timothy Bigelow
William Hall, Jr.
William Prescott, Jr.
Zephaniah Swift
Answer: hope that helped
Explanation: Between 1895 and 1898 Cuba and the Philippine Islands revolted against Spain. The Cubans gained independence, but the Filipinos did not. In both instances the intervention of the United States was the culminating event.
In 1895 the Cuban patriot and revolutionary, José Martí, resumed the Cuban struggle for freedom that had failed during the Ten Years' War (1868-1878). Cuban juntas provided leadership and funds for the military operations conducted in Cuba. Spain possessed superior numbers of troops, forcing the Cuban generals Máximo Gómez and Antonio Maceo, to wage guerrilla warfare in the hope of exhausting the enemy. Operations began in southeastern Cuba but soon spread westward. The Spanish Conservative Party, led by Antonio Cánovas y Castillo, vowed to suppress the insurrectos, but failed to do so.
The Cuban cause gained increasing support in the United States, leading President Grover Cleveland to press for a settlement, but instead Spain sent General Valeriano Weyler to pacify Cuba. His stern methods, including reconcentration of the civilian population to deny the guerrillas support in the countryside, strengthened U.S. sympathy for the Cubans. President William McKinley then increased pressure on Spain to end the affair, dispatching a new minister to Spain for this purpose. At this juncture an anarchist assassinated Cánovas, and his successor, the leader of the Liberal Party Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, decided to make a grant of autonomy to Cuba and Puerto Rico. The Cuban leadership resisted this measure, convinced that continued armed resistance would lead to independence.
WOOOAH
Answer:
Julius Caesar is no doubt the most famous Roman of them all ! He conquered Gaul in a brilliant campaign which is still used in studies for training generals today. His victories in Gaul brought into the empire what should later become one of the most importantnew territories to the empire. hope I helped What did Julius Caesar do for the people?
The statesman and general Julius Caesar (100-44 B.C.) expanded the Roman Republic through a series of battles across Europe before declaring himself dictator for life. He died famously on the steps of the Senate at the hands of political rivals.
Due to the Social War (91–88 BC), individuals outside Italy were not considered “Roman” and thus were not given full citizenship rights. Caesar started the process to fuse the Roman Empire into a single unit by being generous in granting Roman citizenship to those outside Italy. Like, in 49 BC, all inhabitants of Cisalpine Gaul received Roman citizenship. This process of integrating the Roman Empire was completed by his adopted son and the first Roman Emperor,Augustus. Julius Caesar also regulated and systematized municipal government throughout Italy.
I hope I helped
Explanation:
<em>Webster v. Reproductive Services</em> was a Supreme Court case that upheld a Missouri law which placed restrictions of how state funds could be utilized for abortions. This case originated in Missouri. This case upheld restrictions that were viewed as unlikely in <em>Roe v. Wade</em>. In <em>Casey v. Planned Parenthood</em> is was ruled that the state can regulate abortions up to the point of fetal viability (the moment when a fetus could live outside of the womb). In <em>Roe, </em>the state could not regulate any aspect of the abortion process. While <em>Roe v. Wade</em> remains in force, these cases provide specific guidance as it relates to the role of the state in this process.
