The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Your answer would be A. because its talking abotu a change from being windy to raining later.
In questions like this one , you should first read the passage and then read the instructions. DO NOT read the alternatives. Then , with the information you got from the passage , try to awnser the question without looking at the alternatives. Now compare your awnser to the alternatives and eliminate the ones you are sure are wrong.
From the passage you learn that light pollution , caused by man-made lights , sometimes creates fogs and hazes that make the night sky look like a "dark sheet of paper".
If you compare what you understood from the passage to the alternatives , you ll realize that A) is the one that makes more sense and its more compatible with your awnser.
If you eliminated all alternatives you could but there still are 2 choices remaining and you are not sure which one it is , go back to the passage and try to find evidence for each alternative and try to eliminate one of the alternatives
AWNSER : A)
