Answer:
C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
Explanation:
A is incorrect because it technically did not ever place a "ban" on specific races being able to move into suburbs, all it did was segregate whites and blacks in schools, public places, etc.
B is incorrect because minority groups were often discriminated against pay wise and job eligibility wise, so it would not make sense that they would be the only ones that could afford housing in suburbs.
C is correct because white families were the only "group" that could afford the housing because they were least discriminated against in a work environment back in the 1960s.
D is incorrect because it just doesn't make sense, I do not believe the government has any housing financial aid in the 1960s in general.
Hopefully this helps!
Answer:
Match the answers:
Explanation:
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904): The case upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest
Lochner v. New York (1905): The case found that state limitations on workers hours violated their ‘freedom to contract’
The correct answer is D. When unemployed, the government will make payments for that. The more unemployed there are and the longer they are without work, it will mean more spending for the government.
The answer would be C. The French and Indian War left Great Britain in debt
<span>Senators serve terms of four years, ... the process of creating strangely shaped districts that favor the party in .</span>
