Hello. You forgot to put the part of the speech that the question is referring to. The speech part is:
"if we are to win the battle that is now going on around the world between freedom and tyran occurred in recent weeks should have made clear to us all the impact of this adventure on them efforts in space have been under review. with the advice of the vice president, we have examine we may succeed and where we may not. now it is time to take longer strides-time for a great a clearly leading role in space achievement. this in many ways may hold the key to our future on recognizing the head start obtained by the soviets with their large rocket engines, we nevert own. for while we cannot guarantee that we shall one day be first, we can guarantee that any fa additional risk by making it in full view of the world, but this very risk enhances our stature whe whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share. "
Answer:
"this in many ways may hold the key to our future on recognizing the head start obtained by the soviets with their large rocket engines, we nevert own."
Explanation:
The above sentence reinforces the argument of the author of the speech, on why the government should invest in the space race. This is because the phrase shows that the author believes that it is in the space race that this is the key to success in the battle against the Soviet Union. For the author, the investment in the space race would give strength to the USA and establish its power as a potential to be followed and admired.
I need more help understanding
Here are some ideas to get started
Why Cellphones should be allowed:
1) For security in case of emergency
2) Easy access of searching information during class when you need to
3) Contacting parents if you need anything, such as dropping off the lunchbox you left at home
Why cellphones should not
1) Distracts you from teacher if you have it next to you- you watch to check it every time notifications go off
2) You want to be on phone instead of socializing
3) You can get in trouble by doing it when you are not supposed to
Words like <em>never, always, everybody, </em>etc. are absolute nouns and adverbs. In argument, these are usually a sign of over-generalization. These words alone cannot be considered as any kind of appeal (emotional, logical or ethical) since these appeals are done depending on how you use these words, not on the meaning of words as stand-alone.