1. Both parties engage in and benefit from gerrymandering, the practice of redrawing district lines for partisan gain.
2. Both parties also thwart efforts
to combat gerrymandering, such as amendments making
gerrymandering illegal and the adoption of independent
redistricting commissions.
3. At the federal level, both parties benefit from congressional mandated single-member districts.
4. Both parties control the process of formally electing the president.
5. Despite consistent polling showing that voters are unhappy with their limited choice of candidates and want more options in general elections.
By matching each example to its corresponding stimulus or response, we have the following:
Unconditioned Response: vomiting;
- This is a condition or actions that occur without learning it. It is inborn.
Unconditioned Stimulus: food poisoning;
- This is a form of stimulus that results in a natural reaction without forcing it or intentionally doing it.
Conditioned Response: refusal to eat;
- This is a type of response that is learned. It is intentionally done by the subject.
Conditioned Stimulus: a taste of the chicken salad
- This is often considered a neutral stimulus initially but later turns to a learned response over time.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are different forms of taste aversion experienced in living things, particularly humans and animals.
The available options are the following
Stimulus
- Unconditioned Response:
- Unconditioned Stimulus:
- Conditioned Response:
- Conditioned Stimulus:
Examples
- a taste of the chicken salad
- refusal to eat
- vomiting food poisoning
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19843671
Answer:
Confucianism is an ethic of moral uprightness, social order, and filial responsibility. Daoism was a philosophy of universal harmony that urged its practitioners not to get too involved in worldly affairs. Legalism is a theory of autocratic, centralized rule and harsh penalties.
Answer:
In some cases (for example, that of the Talensi), an independent community or chiefdom was aware that others like it shared the same culture and social structure, and there were occasional common rituals that brought independent communities together. In other cases (for example, the Dagaba), political and cultural boundaries were not sharp, and there was no sense that an ethnic group included some communities and excluded others, although shifting distinctions were made based on various cultural traits. In the case of the Dagaba, the most important or recurrent of these distinctions seemed to be, and in the mid-twentieth century continued to be, whether inheritance was exclusively determined in the patrilineal line or, at least in part, followed the matrilineal line.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)
