Answer:
Migration patterns were now more directed to places with available labor and prosperity, due to imperialism and industrialization changing where people could make a good living. People sought a place that they could have a good place to make money and live, and so people looked towards cities that had industries that needed labor. Many of those people might have come from far away or they might just have been in the country trying to farm.
Explanation:
<span>During the early nineteenth century, sectional tensions mounted. New Englanders expressed increasing anxiety over the growing prominence of the western states and the policies of the Jefferson and Madison administrations regarding the Napoleonic conflict in Europe. Slow population growth owing to westward migration and an insecure economy dependent on international trade left New England vulnerable. In a pattern evident in future decades, perceptions of declining fortunes exacerbated sectionalism. Throughout American history, sectionalism seemed most significant in those sections that felt threatened, exploited, or oppressed. Sectionalism in the United States was primarily a defensive rather than an offensive stance. It was a raw nerve in the American identity; when irritated, it was felt sharply.</span>
this were the biggest ones.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).
Secretary of state I believe, but don't take my word for it. Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
Pledging to vote for a candidate would be only positive for this candidate: so we have to choose an option that would not be a positive outcome for this candidate.
Such an option is "making the candidate appear weaker" and indeed, pledging to vote for a candidate would not make this candidate appear weaker. (answer B)
Explanation:
