Answer: The administration’s used the speeches to make a case for going to war
Explanation:
<span>The land available to the village in india was restricted by other vilages</span>
The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.
Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.
Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.
ok i think it might be steel beause the other ones are flimsy kind of so sorry if this doesnt help and yw if it does