What is the difference between European and Native Americans attitudes toward land use and land ownership?

2 answers:

5 0

Native Americans believe the land belongs to everyone while the Europeans believe of land ownership and claiming land for their countries.

sweet-ann [11.9K]4 years ago

3 0

Answer: Native Americans viewed land as something that was to be used communally by all the members of a tribe. There was no idea among the Indians that land was something to be divided up, sold, and owned by individuals.Native Americans had a spiritual vision of Nature and could not conceive land ownership as something respectable. European forced the Natives to adapt gradually to their notion of private property and land ownership.

You might be interested in

Who was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was bonapartewho was b

Evgen [1.6K]

Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.Bonaparte probably refers to Napoleon Bonaparte who was the Emperor of France.

6 0

3 years ago

When was the state of Florida adopted or discovered (however u wanna say it)?

Ket [755]

Florida Was Discovered In 1513. Juan Ponce de León Discovered It.

8 0

3 years ago

The election of 1800 marked the first time power remained with the same political party. the incumbent candidate won another ter

Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

power shifted from one political party to another is the answer

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did the morrill land grant college act establish?

SpyIntel [72]

state universtites to teach agriculture and mechanical arts.

4 0

3 years ago

Why are primary sources important when studying historical events ?

emmasim [6.3K]

Primary sources are important when studying historical events, because they generally give eye-witness accounts of what is going on, albeit with opinions. They give historians a view of what a certain group of people think, the actions they take, and how the events affect their everyday lives. Primary sources also allow others to build on top of it, and to give 'parts of the "whole"', such as the pieces of a puzzle, to giving those in the future a more narrow and personal outlook of things.

hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers