1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
3 years ago
11

Which is a true statement about U.S. involvement in Vietnam?

History
2 answers:
andreyandreev [35.5K]3 years ago
8 0
A is the most reasonable answer, Presidents Eisenhower and Carter were not president during the US involvement in Vietnam and Nixon's Vietnam plan stated for an increase in troops to the country.
7nadin3 [17]3 years ago
5 0

The correct option is "President Nixon announced a Vietnamization plan for withdrawal of U.S. troops. "

President Nixon outlined a plan called Vietnamization, which consisted of a process to withdraw US troops from Vietnam, while fighting was returning to the Vietnamese in the south. The withdrawal of US troops began in July 1969.

You might be interested in
What did the federalists stand for
Liono4ka [1.6K]
Federalists are the people that are for the federal government not against the constitution
6 0
3 years ago
Select ALL the correct answers.
elixir [45]

The three events that showed US citizens were being denied basic rights in the 1940s and 1950s are

e)Taft-Hartley Act of 1947.

b)Hollywood 10 imprisoned (in 1947).

a)Lavender Scare (in 1950).

6 0
2 years ago
Provide one piece of evidence from the period between the first and the second world wars that supports keegan's interpretation
Cloud [144]

Answer:

According to John Keegan, the world wars was not necessary and it was very tragic.

Explanation:

John Keegan was an eminent military historians who wrote great books about wars, one of which is "The First World War". This book was published in the year 1998.

He speaks that the first world war was tragic and it was not necessary. Keegan interprets that the series of events which led to the war could be broken at any time from the five weeks of the crisis which preceded the clash of the arms for the first time. It killed the lives of many millions of people and destroyed the benevolent of the European culture and heritage. He believed that the second world war was a direct outcome of the first world war.

3 0
3 years ago
Russian Revolution
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

d yeah

Explanation:

d yep

3 0
3 years ago
Who is William Dawes?
Tom [10]
William Dawes alerted colonial minutemen in Massachusetts at the approach of British army troops prior to the Battles of Lexington and Concord.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What reforms did progressives work for regarding labor?​
    6·1 answer
  • French and indian war quiz answers
    14·1 answer
  • Why did workers go on strike and begin to form trade unions in the 1830s?
    12·1 answer
  • What was a result of the opium war?
    13·2 answers
  • Why were Ancient Egyptians able to become artisans?
    14·1 answer
  • Great Britain´s primary motivation for acquiring control of the Suez Canal in the late 19th century was to
    14·1 answer
  • Which art movement responded to the horrors of World War I through social rebellion and an attempt to overturn social values?
    10·2 answers
  • Which advantages did Britain have against America during the American war for independence​
    13·1 answer
  • What year was abraham lincoln assasinaded?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Islam affect northern and eastern Africa? Use at least two examples from your reading.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!