comparative study identifies the area where a producer’s absolute advantage is relatively greatest, or where the producer’s absolute disadvantage in productivity is relatively least. Group of answer choices relative advantage opportunity cost productivity advantage comparative advantage
<h3>What is
comparative study ?</h3>
Comparative research is a social science research methodology that aims to make comparisons across different countries or cultures. A significant issue in comparative research is that data sets from different countries may define or use different categories.
Comparative research seeks to identify similarities and differences among social entities. Comparative research attempts to contrast and compare nations, cultures, societies, and institutions.
Comparative research can help inform projects early on by providing fodder and direction for initial design concepts, as well as during design iterations when refining content, interaction, and overall architectural patterns.
To know more about comparative study follow the link:
brainly.com/question/15847343
#SPJ4
Answer:
V(t) = $ 1.5 billion for 2007
V(t) = $1.5 billion, 295 million. For 2012
Doubling time = t = 177.69 yrs
Explanation:
a).
V(t) = 1.5e^(0.039t)
For the first year 2007, t= 0
V(t) = 1.5e^(0.039*0)
V(t). = 1.5e^0
V(t) =. 1.5*1 = 1.5
V(t) = $ 1.5 billion for 2007
For 2012 that is 5 years after,t= 5
V(t) = 1.5e^(0.0039*5)
V(t) = 1.5e^ (0.0195)
V(t) = 1.5(1.019691367)
V(t) = 1.5295
V(t) = $1.5 billion, 295 million.
b). Doubling time is when the value of the export is 1.5 *2 =$ 3 billion
3 = 1.5e^(0.0039t)
3/1.5= e^(0.0039t)
2 = e^0.0039t
In 2 = 0.0039t
0.693= 0.0039t
t = 177.69 yrs
Answer: $20,000
Explanation:
To calculate Citicorp's profit or loss we can use the following formula,
The Citigroup's profit is computed as shown below:
= Exercise Price - Spot Price + Premium received
= $ 0.59 - $ 0.60+ $ 0.02
= $ 0.01 per euro is Citicorp's profit.
Total profit will therefore be:
= $ 0.01 x 2,000,000
= $ 20,000
$20,000 is Citicorp's profit on the call option.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
Answer:
Yes under the theory of conversion.
Explanation:
Conversion occurs when an individual takes possession of an item and excercises ownership of it in a way that is in conflict with the real owner's right of possession.
In this instance Eddy paid in a cheque that was not owned by him. The onus was on the bank to confirm from the account owner the real beneficiary of the check.
This would have prevented the conversion of the check through an illegal indorsement.
Conversion is a common type of fraud with regards to dividend warrants where dividend warrants edited to present a different person as the owner of the check.
Answer:
Kindly see Explanation
Explanation:
Raman is described above as being a government servant, this means Raman is an employee of the Federal or State Government. In other words, Raman works in a government runned establishment. Raman is in the civil service.
Radha who is described as an advocate could be explained as an individual who lends his or her voice in other to make others get heard or a protagonist of a certain course.Radha could be described as being into Law or judicial activities.
Amit who retails electronic goods could be described as being self-employed who is into buying and selling.
Difference between activities of Raman, Radha and Amit.
1.) Engagement sector:
Raman works in the civil service, while Radha work is inclined with the legal and activism process and Amit is into commerce.
EMPLOYER:
2.) Raman is clearly a government employee, Radha could work for Non-governmental or Volunteer organizations, while Amit is Self-employed.
DECISION-MAKING :
3.) Raman works based on defined government framework and rules, Radha as an advocate is more inclined towards promoting morality, While Amit will make decisions based on what is best for his business as an entrepreneur.
