Answer:
I do believe your answer is D: Most of Earth's mantle is always moving.
Hopefully this helped! :D
Answer:
Deductive argument.
Explanation:
A deductive argument can be defined as a type of argument that begins with a factual statement to draw a conclusion. It is a factual and logical reasoning. This argument states that if the premises are true that the conclusion drawn must be true as well.
It applies a 'top-bottom' principle which means that first general statements are made then these statements are narrowed to reach the conclusion.
<u>In the given statement, two premises are stated either Jack can enroll in full-time school or buy a car. Then the statement got narrowed when he thought to enroll in a full-time school than buying a car. Then the conclusion drawn was that he had to put off buying the car</u>.
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
Answer:
The question that best reflects the biggest concern that Tucker must address for Group D is "What are some of the scientific benefits of animal testing?"
Explanation:
Each one of the questions represents one of the groups and the point of view from where they can see the speech from, Group A worries about the monetary affectations, Group B worries about the benefit for labs with the budget, Group C worries about the animal rights, and since Group D does not have a clear posture towards the subject they can not have a specialized worry, which makes the question about the general benefits of testing the suitable question for them.
<span>Weaver also claims that “a majority of seat belt violations” are the fault of the under-21 crowd.
</span><span>That is, we know the police have their eye on the teenagers, but are they looking at the adults as well?
</span><span>Like anybody who is inexperienced, the teenage driver must suffer through a legitimate period of self-doubt and skills acquisition.
Thats all i could find</span>
