How did events in europe lead to revolution in the spanish colonies?

1 answer:

6 0

The Spanish colonies wanted to be independent for quite some time, and they just waited for suitable moment when the Spanish army would not be at its best, sot hat they can rebel and gain independence. The situation in Europe was going in the advantage of the Spanish colonies, as Spain was distracted by war, with Napoleon conquering pretty much everything on the continent. As most of the Spanish army was deployed to defend the homeland, the troops in the colonies were significantly weakened. The people in the colonies were monitoring the situation carefully, and when they saw that the Spanish army is weak enough, they attacked, managed to push them away, and gained independence one by one.

You might be interested in

Who was frightened by the Caesars popularity and then order him to disband his army and return to Rome

s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

The Senate but Caesar didnt care.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Explain how Lydon Johson's personal and polictical experiences might have influneced his actions as president:

Art [367]

Answer:

Explanation below

Explanation:

Lyndon Baines Johnson was born on August 27 near central Texas. When he graduated from Southwest State Teachers College in 1930, he decided to take up a teaching role at a school for Mexican-American students in south Texas for him to save up funds and pay for his education.

During his time at the school, he had first-hand look at the effects of poverty and discrimination on his students and that made remarkable impression on him and he decided he was going on a lifelong journey to find solutions to these challenges.

When he became the 36th President of America, following the assignation of President Kennedy, he declared war on poverty and compelled the congress to pass certain legislations aimed at tackling issues around illiteracy, unemployment and racial discrimination.

8 0

3 years ago

Once scholars believed that neither the Iliad or the Odyssey had any basis in fact. What caused them to change their minds about

navik [9.2K]

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeettt

8 0

2 years ago

In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court decided that a "clear and present danger" to the country allowed the feder

galina1969 [7]

Answer:

b. Restrict first amendment rights.

Explanation:

The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.

The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the "clear and present danger" that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

3 0

2 years ago

Which identifies the effects of the Congress of Vienna?

BartSMP [9]

Correct answer: C. The congress system if set up became a model for the United Nations.

Explanation:

My authority source for choosing answer C is the United Nations itself. UN Chronicle, the magazine of the United Nations, featured an article titled, "From the Congress of Vienna to Present-Day International Organizations" (December, 2014). That article asserts points such as these:

When did the process of international organization start?1 It was not in 1945 nor in 1919. Rather, it was the Congress of Vienna (1814-15) that proved to be the relevant turning point in history, when certain conditions allowed a number of European States to set in motion a series of innovations, inventions and learning processes that shaped the core of what we today refer to as international organizations (IOs).
The major innovation at Vienna was the follow-up conference. This new idea resulted in the custom of participating States to convene, upon reaching an agreement, a follow-up conference to assess whether previously agreed-upon decisions and policies had been executed. ... Consequently, since 1815, that innovative idea resulted in an ongoing cycle of conferences dealing with similar and related issues. Apart from continuity, the cycle produced incremental decision-making and path dependency with regard to selected common solutions and efforts.

5 0

3 years ago