Equity-efficiency tradeoff results when maximizing the productive efficiency of a market leads to a reduction in its equity—as in how equitably its wealth is distributed.
Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
The United States and the Japanese.
Answer:
The three weakness of the treaty are as follows: The lack of the army within the league of nation, Italy and japan resentfulness of the treaty and the President Wilson's failure to get the congressional support.
Explanation:
The three major weakness of the treaty and their reasons are as follows, the shortage of army inside the nation which make them incapable for the league to hold the authority which can take proper decisions and can follow on those decisions. Unsatisfactorily of the Italy and Japan because they wanted more reward for going against the allied power at the time of World war I. To stop the united states from ratifying the treaty the congressional didn't supported the President.
"The American's victory at the Battle of Saratoga was the turning point in America's fight for independence" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>best describes the importance of the victory at the Battle of Saratoga. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "C".</span>
