No; a prepositional phrase begins with (or includes) a preposition such as "of", "through", and "around".This sentence does not have a preposition within it, so, no, it is does not have a prepositional phrase.
To help control the insects in Borneo
Answer:
They didn't reach an agreement <u><em>on account of</em></u> their differences.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the necessary word(s) to be put in the blank will be suggestive of the 'cause' of the first part of the sentence. While the first part contains the effect' of the 'cause', completing the whole sentence depends on the part or parts of the phrase needed.
The given options "on account of", "due", "because" or "owing" are all valid to be used in the given sentence. But considering the form and structure of the sentence, the blank will be filled by "on account of".
To use the other options, we would need to add more to the already given words. We cannot simply write "they didn't reach an agreement due/owing/because their differences." For "due" and "owing", it needs "to" to make the sentence whole. Likewise, "because" requires "of" to be usable. If we add these words to the already given words, then the sentence can become
they didn't reach an agreement due to/ because of/ owing to their differences. But these options are wrong as the words are incomplete.
Thus, the correct answer is "on account of".
<em><u>They didn't reach an agreement on account of their differences.</u></em>
The word C. territory has the same root of the word terrain, as they both refer to a type of ground in one way or another.
Raja was a strong leader who used to govern, whereas Dasa or Dasi are captive slaves who once served their lords. This is how the lives of the two groups differed. Raja is able to make sacrifices, unlike Dasa or Dasis.
A slave was not autonomous, although a raja was. Rajas enjoyed respect due to their position of authority. But in most instances, a slave must have drawn jeers and sympathy.
The rajas had no cities, palaces, armies, or tax collection systems. In general, sons did not always succeed their fathers as rajas.
Later, the word evolved to refer to a slave or dasa. Men and women who were taken during the war became slaves. They were treated as the owners' property, and the owners had the right to demand that they perform any tasks.
Learn more about life of raja:
brainly.com/question/779907
#SPJ4
